01
Structure the matter
Capture parties, events, dates, and relief sought so retrieval runs against a structured matter file rather than a loose prompt.
Matter factsALPHAMATCH PRODUCT / AILexSys
Research and review matter files with sources your team can check.
AILexSys combines jurisdiction-aware retrieval, cited answers, and review controls for legal teams working across sensitive documents.
- BYOK supported
- Citation-verified answers
- HK, SG, and UK matters
Matter research
Cited findings with a reviewer approval state.
The workspace shows the matter question, jurisdiction marker, cited sources, and whether a reviewer has approved the finding before it leaves the file.
Workflow
How the work moves.
02
Retrieve sources
Pull legislation, authorities, and uploaded files for the selected jurisdiction, with each result tied to a citable source.
Jurisdiction-aware retrieval03
Review findings
Counsel checks cited answers and contract flags against primary sources before anything is treated as advice.
Reviewer approval04
Deliver
Hand off a cited memo, redline, or playbook-guided review with the source trail still attached.
Cited output Capabilities
Capability groups, not a feature dump.
Cited answers from matter files
Ask across contracts, case packs, and regulations; every answer points back to a source the team can open.
Citation chips on the research panel
Jurisdiction-aware retrieval
Filter research for Hong Kong, Singapore, the UK, or the matter at hand instead of mixing authorities.
Jurisdiction marker on the finding
Contract review with playbooks
Run playbook-guided review with issue flags at clause level, not a plain-text summary of the file.
Reviewer approval state
BYOK or on-premise model
Keep prompts and retrieval in your environment when your control model requires it—no middleman in the loop by default.
On-prem / your key
Citation auditor
Check cited cases against live legal databases before a finding is marked ready for the client file.
Source verified label
Shared matter workspace
Legal and compliance work from the same source of truth rather than parallel personal chats.
Matter file sidebar
Use cases
Where the workflow changes the decision.
Structured matter intake, jurisdiction-aware retrieval, and cited synthesis for reviewer sign-off.
Counsel needs authorities for a matter without pasting client facts into a public model.
- Matter facts stay in the workspace
- Primary legislation and case law with citations
- IRAC-style synthesis tied to sources
Control
Built around your control model
Legal work only moves when source control, deployment choice, and reviewer sign-off are explicit—not implied by a chat window.
- Existing-system integration with matter files and document stores
- Roles and review checkpoints before findings leave the workspace
- Source and document permissions for sensitive client files
- On-premise or BYOK so model traffic can stay in your environment
- Auditability and implementation support for HK, SG, and UK teams
Evaluation
Where AILexSys is the better fit
Compare a matter-file workspace with a general-purpose tool or the existing manual research process. Competitor names are omitted where a live comparison cannot be maintained.
| Capability | General-purpose tool | Existing process | AILexSys with AlphaMatch implementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cited sources on matter files | Depends on pasted context | Manual research | Cited sources in the workspace |
| Jurisdiction filtering | Not supported | Researcher judgement | Configurable |
| On-premise or BYOK | Not supported | Depends on IT | Depends on implementation |
| Reviewer approval | Not supported | Manual review | Review checkpoint |
Next
Bring one matter workflow to the conversation.
We will assess the data, systems, review controls, and implementation work involved—then advise whether a product working session, pilot, or wider delivery plan makes sense.
Which legal workflow are you looking to improve?